Legal Opinion

Maulsbury v. Shure

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 20, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, in an action to recover damages claimed to have been sustained as the result of the negligent operation of an automobile. A motor vehicle owned and driven by one Porman, and occupied by plaintiff, and an automobile. of defendant collided at a highway intersection in Asbury Park.

The several grounds of appeal assigned and pressed by appellant may be grouped under six heads.

The first point urged is that the trial court erroneously permitted counsel for plaintiff to address the following question to the jury, after it was empaneled and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Molnar v. Hildebrecht Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Daggett v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  3. Schreiner v. New York & New Jersey Telephone Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  4. Shoemaker v. ElmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  5. Cottrell v. Asbury FountainSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Addison v. TessierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Clark v. PiccilloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API