Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Livesay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 12, 1916No. 7448PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Texas County; W. C. Crow, Judge. Action by J. M. Livesay against the Ford Motor Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

The W. K. Prudden Company manufactured wheels for the Ford Motor Company, who used the same in assembling their No. 174900 Model T 1913 automobile. In March, 1913, the plaintiff purchased from A. D. Hopkins this machine, and in May following was injured while driving along a smooth road at the rate of 22 miles an hour by reason of the breaking of the spokes in the right wheel of said automobile. This action is brought against the Ford Motor Company, wherein it is alleged. that it failed and_negleeted to put proper material in such wheel, and carelessly and negligently…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Steffen v. McNaughtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Curtin v. SomersetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Jones v. HogeWashington Supreme Court · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Coe v. EsauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Crane Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Palacine Oil Co. v. PhilpotSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. People v. KastingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API