Legal Opinion

Rubenstein Const. Co. v. Salt River Project Agr. Improvement & Power Dist.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1953No. 5790PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Chief Justice.

Rubenstein Construction Company, a corporation (plaintiff-appellant), during the years 1951-1952 constructed five hundred dwelling units at Williams Air Force Base. Each unit was and is served by the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, a corporation (defendant-appellee), with electrical energy for lighting, etc. As a condition precedent to such service, defendant demanded from plaintiff a connection charge of $25 per unit, which was paid. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

Plaintiff by this action sought the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Day v. Buckeye Water Conservation & Drainage DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. La PradeArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. City of Phoenix v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Uhlmann v. WrenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of KingmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API