Herbert v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
The question presented is whether the District of Columbia is vicariously hable under the “non-delegable duty” doctrine to a prisoner at the District of Columbia jail for injuries resulting from medical malpractice on the part of an employee of an independent contractor, where the contractor was providing medical services at the jail under the terms of a contract with the District’s Department of Corrections (DOC). We conclude that the “non-delegable duty” doctrine has no apphcation and that the plaintiff is not entitled to any recovery against the District.
I
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Spicer v. . WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- District of Columbia v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Johnson v. Georgia Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Capitol Sprinkler Inspection, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- In re Pers. Restraint of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2021
- Harrelson v. DupnikDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.