Legal Opinion
Harrelson v. Dupnik
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 27, 2013No. CV 11-411-TUC-FRZPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FRANK R. ZAPATA, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Estrada. In his Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Estrada recommends denying in part and granting in part Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the motions for summary judgment, the objections are denied.1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:(1) Magistrate Judge Estrada’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 131) is accepted and adopted.(2) The motions for summary judgment…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cutler v. Pima, County ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- J.P. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023