Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Royer Garden Center & Greenhouse, Inc.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 17, 1991No. 2001 thru 2004 C.D. 1990, 2067 C.D. 1990, 2068 C.D. 1990, 2096 C.D. 1990, 2120 C.D. 1990, 2121 thru 2123 C.D. 1990, and 2152 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLINS, Judge.
Susquehanna Township (Township), Kohler Signal Company (Kohler), Judy L. Bortz (Bortz), and collective appellants Julia Mercurio, Administratrix of the Estate of Mariano Mercurio (Mercurio), Lloyd L. and Wienona M. Glazer (Glazer) and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (USF & G), appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County (trial court), which denied their post-trial motions for molding a jury’s damages verdict and the trial court’s calculation of delay damages.
The above-captioned consolidated matters on appeal arose from the following factual…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hart v. W.H. Stewart, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Crowell v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Buschman v. DruckCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Catina v. MareeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Henry v. McCruddenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rohm & Haas Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Allen v. MellingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Krevitz v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Ellis v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Swartz v. Hilltown Township Volunteer Fire Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.