Legal Opinion

United States v. Mehanna

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 13, 2013No. 12-1461PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

Terrorism is the modern-day equivalent of the bubonic plague: it is an existential threat. Predictably, then, the government’s efforts to combat terrorism through the enforcement of the criminal laws will be fierce. Sometimes, those efforts require a court to patrol the fine line between vital national security concerns and forbidden encroachments on constitutionally protected freedoms of speech and association. This is such a case.

As if that were not enough, the case presents a welter of other issues. At the risk of singling out one of many, we pay particular heed to the…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. MoroscoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. Shervin v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. PonzoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. BramleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API