United States v. Bramley
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This sentencing appeal requires us to explore the intersection between the right of a sentencing judge to receive confidential advice from probation officers and the right of a convicted defendant to know the nature of the information upon which he is sentenced and to challenge its relevancy and accuracy. Concluding, as we do, that the court below did not plainly err by engaging in brief, off-the-record conversations with a probation officer during the appellant’s sentencing, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
The relevant facts and travel of the case can be succinctly summarized.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Sindi v. El-MoslimanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Hampton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- United States v. Flete-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Padilla-GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Rivera-CarrasquilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.