Legal Opinion

Mallory v. Pioneer-Press Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 18, 1886PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Koon, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDicKinson, J.

This is an action for libel, the cause of action being the publication in a newspaper, on the ninth da¡y of July, 1884, of the following article: “A young man named Frank Mallory, employed as driver and collector by A. H. Gow, has disappeared with some of his employer’s funds, and the police have been notified. ” A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff. This appeal is from an order refusing a new trial. The only questions upon which our decision is invoked are those which we now proceed to consider.

1. It is said that the truth of the published statement was conclusively shown. This point…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Detroit Daily Post Co. v. McArthurMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Foster v. ScrippsMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Perret v. New Orleans Times NewspaperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1873
  4. Usher v. SeveranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Crow v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Morse v. Times-Republican Printing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Marr v. PutnamOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Upton v. HumeOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Dupont Engineering Co. v. Nashville Banner Pub. Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API