Legal Opinion

Britton v. Koep

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 1991No. C8-90-1169PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YETKA, Justice.

This action for defamation arose as a result of statements the defendant-appel lant, Mary Koep, a Crow Wing County commissioner, made at a meeting of Crow Wing and Morrison County commissioners. Koep stated that an informant told her that a county probation officer had coerced female probationers for sexual favors. Plaintiff-respondent, David Britton, was one of two county probation officers. He brought suit.

The trial court heard cross motions for summary judgment on January 16, 1990, and ruled in favor of the defendants-appellants in all respects. On appeal, the court…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Northwest Airlines, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Astraea Aviation Services, Inc., Doing Business as Dalfort Aviation, a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Moreno v. Crookston Times Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Weinberger v. Maplewood ReviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Stepnes v. RitschelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API