Legal Opinion
Super Star Sneakers & Sports, Inc. v. Bata Shoe Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 17, 1981No. 78 C 1535PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
Plaintiff (“Super Star”) has sued defendant (“Bata”) to recover treble damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C.' § 15 for alleged violations of § 2(a) of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a). Super Star claims that after ordering and agreeing to pay $3,363.99 for sneakers sold by Bata, it discovered that Bata was -selling identical goods to at least one other customer at much lower prices. Super Star never paid for the sneakers and a default judgment in State court was entered in Bata’s favor in a suit on the contract. The action is now before the court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Will v. Calvert Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Artmatic USA Cosmetics v. Maybelline Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Townview Nursing Home—Debtor-In-Possession v. New York (In Re Townview Nursing Home)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983