Legal Opinion
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE PA. v. Casey
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 12, 1993No. Civ. A. 88-3228PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
This constitutional challenge to numerous provisions of the 1988 and 1989 amendments to the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act (“the amended Act”), 18 Pa.Cons.Stat. §§ 3201-3220, is back before this Court on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States and the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Plaintiffs have moved to reopen the record so that they may introduce additional evidence to satisfy the burden of proof required by the new “undue burden” standard recently announced by the Supreme Court. 1 Plaintiffs also request that this Court…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Karlin v. FoustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Casey v. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey No. A-655Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- A Woman's Choice-East Side Women's Clinic v. NewmanDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
- Karlin v. FoustDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.