Legal Opinion

Lakeland Neurocare Centers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2002No. Docket 224245PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order denying its motion for no-fault penalty interest, MCL 500.3142, and attorney fees, MCL 500.3148(1). We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff filed this action against defendant, a no-fault insurer, as a consequence of defendant’s denials of plaintiff’s requests for payment for rehabilitation services rendered to Arthur Smith, defendant’s insured, 1 who was a pedestrian injured in a motor vehicle accident. Defendant denied plaintiff’s claims for payment, alleging that Smith was not struck by a motor vehicle. Subsequently, after plaintiff filed a motion for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hagerman v. Gencorp AutomotiveMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. McGill v. Auto Ass'n of MichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Darnell v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Crowe v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Moody v. Home Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Amerisure Insurance v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Amerisure Ins. Co. v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Allstate Insurance Co v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Wyoming Chiropractic Health Clinic Pc v. Auto-Owners Ins CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API