Legal Opinion

Federal Housing Administrator v. Christianson

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 14, 1939No. Civ. 83PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

The complaint in the first count states a cause of action against three defendants on a promissory note, and in the second count states a cause of action against two of said defendants upon another promissory note. The payees of the notes and the face amount of the notes are different. One note is dated at Bridgeport March 2, 1937, and the other is dated at Boston on the same date. The complaint alleges with respect to each note that it was endorsed to the plaintiff on or about March 2, 1937.

The matter is before the court upon a motion of the defendants to dismiss…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. North American Rockwell Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Sun-X Glass Tinting of Mid-Wisconsin, Inc. v. Sun-X International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. Adrian Bank v. LutenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  4. Philadelphia Dressed Beef Co. v. Wilson & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Carrasquillo v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API