Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Dressed Beef Co. v. Wilson & Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 14, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 20096PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, District Judge.
This matter is brought before the Court on defendants’ motions to sever and dismiss.
This is a treble damage action brought by the plaintiff, a Delaware corporation, an operator of a slaughter house, wherein damages are sought from defendant meat rendering companies for violation of the anti-trust laws. Alleged in the same complaint is a breach of contract claim against Wilson & Co., a Delaware corporation, one of the defendants also charged with violation of the Sherman and Clayton Acts, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 et seq., 12 et seq.
The motions to sever are predicated upon the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Neiman-Marcus v. LaitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Pearce v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Foltz v. Moore McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co. v. KrugCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Construcciones Werl, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1975
- Fair Housing Development Fund Corp. v. BurkeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Smith v. North American Rockwell Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1970
- United States v. Glaxo Group LimitedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
- Mesa Computer Utilities, Inc. v. Western Union Computer Utilities, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.