Legal Opinion

Williams v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1924No. 6551PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARIS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in error, who were defendants below, were sued on a supersedeas bond by the United States, and, being east, sued out this writ of error.

Heretofore defendant Joe Williams was convicted on an indictment in three counts, which charged him with a conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 1013814 et seq.), as also with two actual violations of said act, and his punishment was fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of one year and a day, and on the two remaining counts, fines, totaling $500, were assessed against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. In Re ClaasenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Hardesty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  5. Murry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  2. United States v. St. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. Peters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. United States v. MarroneDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1959
  5. Estes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API