Legal Opinion

United States v. Marrone

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided April 9, 1959No. Crim. Nos. 4031, 4033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCARREY, District Judge.

By order of the Court, these two cases have been consolidated for argument.

The defendants filed a motion for continuance “ * * * upon the ground that this Court has no jurisdiction to try the offense with which he is charged, this court being a Territorial court abolished by the admission of Alaska to Statehood.” The question to be determined by the Court is whether the defendants should be granted a continuance until the question of the jurisdiction of the District Court for the Territory of Alaska over state matters is determined by an appellate tribunal.

Both the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Coyle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Juneau Spruce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Tinkoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. EgelakDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1959
  2. In Re Island Airlines, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API