Legal Opinion

Connley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1930No. 6124PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Appellants moved this court to strike from an order of the District Court allowing an appeal herein and fixing a bond thereon, the following proviso:

“And that the bonds be conditioned that if thé judgment be affirmed or appeal dismissed the several fines and the costs of the prosecution willobe paid.”

The order allowing appeal, which under the new practice corresponds to the writ of error, allows the appeal in express terms. The effect of this order operates as a supersedeas in so far as the term of imprisonment imposed by the judgment is concerned. In re Claasen, 140 U.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re ClaasenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Hardesty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  3. American Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
  4. Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
  5. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. United States Ex Rel. Rubinstein v. MulcahyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. State v. IglesiasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Cain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  5. Forest v. United States. Sentner v. United States. Manewitz v. United States. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API