Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Puddicombe

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1996No. S-6579PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Craig Puddicombe and John Dunham filed an action to quiet title to property they owned. Joanne Fitzgerald and Michael Con-nor claimed a right to use a trail through the property. After a bench trial, the superior court denied Fitzgerald’s and Connor’s claims, quieted title in and awarded partial attorney’s fees to Puddicombe and Dunham. Fitzgerald appeals. We reverse.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Puddicombe and Dunham own United States Survey 5265 (USS 5265), located on the Knik River near Metal Creek. They acquired the property in 1983 from Joanne…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oaksmith v. BrusichAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hamerly v. DentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Tundra Tours, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. McGill v. WahlAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Carey Mills v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Dodson v. DodsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Price v. EasthamAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Offshore Systems-Kenai v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API