Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert P. Deluca, Sr., United States of America v. Gerard T. Ouimette, United States of America v. Gerard T. Ouimette
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 14, 1998No. 96-1173, 96-1221 and 96-2231PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendants Robert P. DeLuca, Sr. (“De-Luca Sr.”) and Gerard T. Ouimette appeal their respective convictions for conspiring to use extortionate means to collect extensions of credit, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894, and for aiding and abetting the use of extortionate means to collect extensions of credit, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 894. Their principal claim asserts a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial, see Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39, 104 S.Ct. 2210, 81 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984), relating to the spectator screening procedure implemented sua…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. QuinonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- United States v. Soto-BeniquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.