Legal Opinion
In Re Lamug
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
Decided February 18, 2009No. 19-10058PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION RE MOTION BY UNITED STATES TRUSTEE TO DISMISS CHAPTER 7 CASE PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(3)
ROGER L. EFREMSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is the motion by the United States Trustee (the “UST”) to Dismiss the chapter 7 bankruptcy case of debtors Marissa Lamug and Dan Famular-cano (the “Debtors”) pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(3) (the “Motion”) 1 . The Motion has been fully briefed and argued and the Court now renders its decision.
I. INTRODUCTION
The UST has asked this Court to dismiss Debtors’ bankruptcy case as an abuse of chapter 7 under § 707(b)(3), based solely…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Maney v. KagenveamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Zolg v. Kelly (In re Kelly)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Thomas W. Price, Debtor, Thomas W. Price v. United States TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- In Re PakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McDow v. Meade (In Re Meade)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009
- In Re HageneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2009
- In re SutticeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2013
- In Re RoppoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Amanda Elizabeth SchwendtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 2025