Legal Opinion

I.T.O. Corporation of Baltimore v. William Sellman Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 2, 1992No. 90-1531PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:

This case arises out of a claim filed under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (1986). Employer, I.T.O. Corporation of Baltimore (“I.T.O.”), appeals from a decision of the Benefits Review Board (“Board”) affirming an administrative law judge’s (ALJ) decision denying I.T.O.’s request to terminate compensation and medical benefit payments or, alternatively, to offset its liability against settlement proceeds received by the claimant, William Sellman, through a third-party settlement agreement. We agree with the Board…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Kasten Construction Co. v. Rod Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Automatic Retailers of America, Inc. v. Evans Cigarette Service Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Robinson Terminal Warehouse Corp. v. AdlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. I.T.O. Corporation of Baltimore v. William Sellman Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Evans Financial Corp. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. McCarter v. Alaska National Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API