Legal Opinion

Nitka v. Betlinski

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 28, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

This action was instituted to foreclose two mortgages given by the defendant as security for loans made to her by the plaintiff’s intestate, Frank Ludwin. The defendant admitted the execution of the mortgages but pleaded payment of one loan in full and partial payment of the other. The court decided for the plaintiff on these issues and rendered judgment of foreclosure, from which the defendant has appealed.

The court found the following facts: The defendant’s husband and Ludwin were close friends. On February 23, 1934, the defendant borrowed $24,000 from Ludwin and, on April 28, 1936, an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Radtke v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Katz v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. City of Norwalk v. TrombettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API