Legal Opinion

United States v. Garcia

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 28, 2007No. 05-11418PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal, we consider the adequacy of defense counsel’s Anders brief where the defendant has advised counsel that he does not wish to challenge his guilty plea. We conclude that ordinarily counsel must file a transcript and brief the issues surrounding the plea unless the record reflects that the defendant has chosen not to challenge the plea.

I

Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Julio Garcia (Garcia) pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. 2 The district court sentenced Garcia to 64 months of imprisonment and four years of supervised…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. James Albert Jones v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. CorderoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Polanco-OzortoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Cristomo Santana-RojasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Edgar Melgar-GuardadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Eduardo Aleman-BrievaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Homero Vega-CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API