Mckinney v. Mills
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Clay county against I. E. Mills, defendant, to recover $612 on a contract, and against R. J. Pratt, as garnishee. The garnishee disclosed an indebtedness of $1,400 to defendant. From an order, Baxter, J., denying the garnishee’s motion to dismiss the action and the garnishee proceedings, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The plaintiff herein, the defendant, and the garnishee were each and all domiciled in the state of North Dakota when plaintiff instituted the main action in a court of this state, and caused the garnishee summons to be served upon the garnishee, who was at the time in this state temporarily upon business, and was the only party within our jurisdiction.' The indebtedness of the garnishee to the defendant arose in North Dakota, and was payable there. It never had a situs in the state of Minnesota, unless it was brought within our borders by the garnishee just prior to the service of the summons…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harvey v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Swedish-American National Bank v. BleeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Rindge v. GreenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1879
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alfred v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Bristol v. BrentUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Krafve v. RoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Boyle v. Musser-Sauntry Land, Logging & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Starkey v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.