Legal Opinion

Airia Browning v. MHM Support Services

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 2026No. 5:24-cv-00018Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA AIRIA BROWNING, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-24-18-D ) MHM SUPPORT SERVICES, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 40]. Plaintiff, Airia Browning, filed a response [Doc. No. 44], to which Defendant replied [Doc. No. 45]. The matter is fully briefed and at issue. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff was employed by Defendant, MHM Support Services (MHM), as a Medical Assistant I from approximately November 2021 until June 2023. Plaintiff filed suit against Defendant…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API