Legal Opinion
Fahmy v. Jay-Z
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 31, 2018No. 16-55213PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Opinion filed on May 31, 2018, is amended as set out in the attached Amended Opinion.
With that amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Bea and Judge Callahan voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Kelly so recommended. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is therefore DENIED .
No further petitions for rehearing will be accepted in this case.
AMENDED OPINION
BEA,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- DRK Photo v. McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Creative Technology, Ltd., a Singapore Corporation v. Aztech System Pte, Ltd, a Singapore Corporation Aztech Labs, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Roberts v. GordyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
- Creative Photographers, Inc. v. Julie Torres Art, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2023
- Hawaiian Kingdom v. BidenDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 73.252.135.137District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 102.129.252.38District Court, N.D. California · 2025
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.