DirecTV, Inc. v. Bertram
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ 1 Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff DirecTV, Inc. has filed numerous actions against individual defendants who have purchased devices primarily useful for intercepting DirecTV’s encrypted satellite transmissions without authorization by, or payment to, DirecTV. The complaints seek relief under 47 U.S.C. § 605(a) for unauthorized reception of satellite signals (Count I); under 18 U.S.C. § 2511(l)(a) for unauthorized interception of electronic communications (Count II);…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schaller Telephone Company v. Golden Sky Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Young v. City Of St. CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Elizabeth Graham Flowers Frankie Dukes v. Tandy Corporation, and William Lee Flowers Martha Floyd GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Russell E. Carney v. Robert Houston Harold Clark Linda Lenard Wilber Newell Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Direct TV, Inc. v. TreworgyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- DirecTV, Inc. v. BoggessDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004
- DirecTV, Inc. v. TascheDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- DirecTV Inc. v. DeskinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- DirecTV, Inc. v. BakerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.