Legal Opinion

Russell E. Carney v. Robert Houston Harold Clark Linda Lenard Wilber Newell Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 18, 1994No. 93-2380PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Per curiam

Russell E. Carney, a Nebraska inmate, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). We affirm.

Carney brought this action against several prison officials, alleging that they improperly used a failure-to-appear charge to withhold four points from his classification score. Carney asserted that he had failed to appear at a Nebraska court hearing in July 1991 because he was in jail in Kansas, and that he was never formally charged because “the failure to appear was part of a plea bargain for [him] to plead no contest.”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hiawatha Nash v. Lee Roy Black, David Blackwell, Dale Riley, Gerald T. Frey, Donna Kay Brown and Mike CurranCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. Cedar Rapids Community School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  2. Stone Motor Company v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. Harold F. Hains III v. Odie WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. De Wit v. Firstar Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  5. In Re Gen. Motors Corp. Anti-Lock Brake Products Liability Lit.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API