Maynard & Son v. Ponder
Supreme Court of Georgia
Partnership. Verdict. Parties. Practice in Superior Court. New Trial. Debtor and Creditor. Statute of Frauds. Charge of Court. Before-Judge Stewart, Monroe Superior Court. August Term, 1S84. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Justice.
Ponder sued Maynard & Sou, a firm composed of William T. Maynard and Preston B. Maynard, to recover from them a bill of goods alleged to have been furnished on their account and at their request to one George W. Bassett. The firm, by their attorneys, acknowledged service of this writ; they appeared and pleaded the general issue and other pleas to the suit, and on these pleas the case was tried, and each partner was present and testified at the trial. The jury, under the proofs and charge of the court, returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against William T. Maynard, and a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Merritt v. BagwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Francis v. Dickel & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Wooten & Co. v. NallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Flournoy & Epping v. WootenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
3Cited by11 opinions
- Austin v. ApplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Ryner v. DukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Pittsburg, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Darlington's Admx.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Roggenkamp v. HargreavesNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.