Legal Opinion
Center for Energy & Economic Development v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 18, 2005No. 03-1222PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Haze obscuring the Grand Canyon and various other national parks and wilderness areas in the west is a multi-state problem: In the interests of developing a solution, the Environmental Protection Agency in 1999 adopted a Regional Haze Rule (“Haze Rule”), 40 C.F.R. §§ 51.308-309. Section 308 required states to impose best available retrofit technology (“BART”) on so-called “BART-eligible sources,” a specified class of large stationary pollution sources that had been in operation since August 7, 1977. In American Corn Growers Ass’n v. EPA, 291 F.3d 1…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- American Corn Growers Association v. Environmental Protection Agency, State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Shays v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- American Petroleum Institute v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- WildEarth Guardians v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Nebraska v. United States EPACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.