Legal Opinion

Nebraska v. United States EPA

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 3, 2016No. 12-3084, 12-3085PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Circuit Judge.

On July 6, 2012, EPA partially disapproved the Nebraska Regional Haze State Implementation Plan. EPA specifically rejected Nebraska’s best available retrofit technology (BART) determination for Gerald Gentleman Station, substituting a Federal Implementation Plan. The State of Nebraska petitioned for review. National Parks Conservation Association and Sierra Club (conservation organizations) not only oppose Nebraska’s petition but also seek review of EPA’s federal plan. Nebraska Public Power District intervened on behalf of EPA, opposing the conservation organizations.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Russellville Legends LLC v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  2. Anderson v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
  3. Dolgencorp, LLC v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. Fairbanks v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
  5. Gekonge v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API