Legal Opinion
Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Stadelman
California Supreme Court
Decided September 17, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 13187PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
The petitioner in this matter is the insurance carrier under a policy of workmen’s compensation insurance issued to Peter C. Stadelman, one of the respondents. The policy contained the following provision:
“(d) It is agreed upon the delivery and acceptance of this Policy, that if the Employer is an individual and has a family (meaning husband, wife, son, daughter, brother, sister or parent residing within this Employer’s household), this Policy shall not apply to any member or members of such family except those named in the Declarations with disclosures of the annual amounts of wages,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Worswick Street Paving Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Golden State HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Eagle Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- National Automobile Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- National Auto. Ins. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Md. Cas. Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.