Clark v. Nooth
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
FLYNN, J., pro tempore
In this post-conviction case, petitioner seeks relief from his conviction for first-degree rape, ORS 163.375. On appeal, petitioner assigns error to the post-conviction court’s denial of two claims for relief that are based on the allegation that petitioner was restrained by a leg brace during his criminal trial without findings to justify the restraint—both a “stand-alone” claim that the restraint violated his state and federal constitutional rights as well as a claim that he was denied constitutionally adequate and effective assistance of counsel, in violation of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maney v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- McDonnell v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Aung v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022