Legal Opinion

Clark v. Nooth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 12, 2017No. 12069496P; A155558PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLYNN, J., pro tempore

In this post-conviction case, petitioner seeks relief from his conviction for first-degree rape, ORS 163.375. On appeal, petitioner assigns error to the post-conviction court’s denial of two claims for relief that are based on the allegation that petitioner was restrained by a leg brace during his criminal trial without findings to justify the restraint—both a “stand-alone” claim that the restraint violated his state and federal constitutional rights as well as a claim that he was denied constitutionally adequate and effective assistance of counsel, in violation of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maney v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. McDonnell v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Aung v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API