Legal Opinion

Providence Washington Ins. Co. v. Cooper

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 30, 1949No. 6459PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

The extended coverage provision of the insurance contracts upon which Hugh Cooper, plaintiff below, predicated his recovery insured him against “direct Joss by windstorm, hurricane, hail, riot * * * and land vehicles.” The policy expressly excepted liability for “any loss caused by snowstorm * * * high water * * * whether driven by wind or not * *

A 42 x 100 foot frame building owned and used by plaintiff as a. skating rink was hit by a windstorm in the afternoon of January 18, 1948. By late afternoon of the next day a 5-inch snow had fallen in the area. This snow remained…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coyle v. Palatine Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. Trexler Lumber Co. v. Allemannia Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Fireman's Ins. Co. of Newark v. WeathermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Phenix Ins. v. Charleston Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1895
  5. Palatine Ins. Co. v. PetrovichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. McKillipTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gillis v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. National Security Life & Casualty Co. v. BenhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Fidelity Southern Fire Insurance Company v. CrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Shirey v. Tri-State Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API