McCarty v. Reynolds Metals Co.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
BARKER, Chief Judge.
This matter is currently before the court on Reynolds Metals Company’s (“Reynolds”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint and this court’s Order of January 5, 1995, directing the briefing of specific issues raised by the court. For the reasons set forth below, we grant Defendant’s motion to dismiss.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Michael McCarty is employed by Reynolds as a machinist in Reynolds’ Louisville plant. Reynolds is engaged in the production and sale of aluminum foil. McCarty’s duties included the maintenance and upkeep of Reynolds’ equipment.
In March,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
- Acevedo v. Caribbean Transp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- England v. Thermo Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
- Stutler v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
- CALVERT v. NEW ALBANY MOTOR COMPANY, INC. d/b/a COYLE CHEVROLETDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.