Legal Opinion
Smith v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided August 26, 1996No. IP 93-1455-C M/SPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MeKINNEY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”) and UAW Local 685 and UAW International (collectively the “Union”), and on the motion for leave to amend the complaint filed by the plaintiffs (the “Employees”). The Employees have not responded to the pending summary judgment motions, although the time for response expired on May 2, 1996. Instead, on April 29, 1996, they filed a motion for leave to amend along with a proposed amended complaint that omits the Age Discrimination in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- William J. Kross v. Western Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Keith C. Moore v. State of Indiana, Indiana Department of Corrections and Thomas D. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nutrasweet Company, and Monsanto Company v. X-L Engineering Company, and Paul T. Prikos, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc. v. AE Biofuels, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2009
- Coats v. Kraft Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Spolnik v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
- Antionette C. Taylor v. Family Health Centers, Inc., et al.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026