Legal Opinion
United States v. Blaze
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 9, 2003No. 01-1370PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant-appellant Johnny Blaze appeals the district court’s decision denying him 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief. In a previous order and judgment, this court denied Blaze a certificate of appealability (COA) on three ineffective-assistance claims challenging his federal racketeering…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- ELLAISY v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021