Legal Opinion

Hunt v. . State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 27, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbe liability of tbe State, as self-insurer, under tbe Workmen’s Compensation Act, for injuries arising out of and in tbe course of tbe employment of a duly 'enlisted National Guardsman was considered in Baker v. State, 200 N. C., 232, 156 S. E., 917.

But it is provided by section 40 of tbe Workmen’s Compensation Act that in case tbe deceased employee leaves no dependents, the employer shall pay tbe amount allowed thereunder “to tbe personal representative of tbe deceased.” When a statute names a person to receive funds, and authorizes him to sue therefor, no one but tbe person so designated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Baker v. . StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. R. G. Chapman & Co. v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. State v. . BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Slade v. Willis Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. McGill v. Bison Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. Lanier v. VinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Malloy v. DanielCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Darden v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API