Legal Opinion

State v. Tuttle

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The defendant was taken into police custody for questioning. During interrogation, the detective threatened that the defendant’s failure to cooperate would be noted in the police report, suggesting that refusal to admit guilt might result in harsher treatment. Because a person cannot be coerced into foregoing a Fifth Amendment right, and because this threat plainly caused the defendant to confess, we conclude under the totality of circumstances that the confession was obtained involuntarily and should be suppressed. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

A

Background

[¶…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. S.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  2. State of Tennessee v. David Hooper Climer, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. SwaniganSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API