United States v. Williams
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES, Judge:
Sergeant Williams was convicted by a general court-martial of three rapes, a robbery, sodomy, and an aggravated assault.1 On appeal he contests the propriety of identifications resulting from a photographic line-up, identification of his automobile, admissibility of testimony about blood type analysis by the investigators, the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the convictions, “future dangerousness” testimony in sentencing, the severity of the resulting sentence, and the convening authority’s qualifications to act on the sentence.
After we first decided…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. AndersonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. Private E2 ERICK C. BLACKArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994