Legal Opinion

McGee v. Heim

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 22, 1961No. 19306PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sutton.

The parties are here in the same order they appeared in the trial court and will be so referred to or by name.

Richard and Mary McGee were the owners of a small building, part of which they occupied as a residence, and a part of which was rented to the defendant Ed Heim for use as a machine shop. On a day in October 1956, Heim was alone at the shop doing some metalizing when a fire broke out. He immediately obtained and emptied a nearby fire extinguisher but was unable to control the fire. He thereupon warned Mrs. McGee and summoned the aid of nearby packing house…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weiss v. AxlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. Beasley v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1948
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Company v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Bowman v. EldherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Hufford v. CicovichWashington Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. PippinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. Moses v. MosesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. Adams v. LeidholdtColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Zimmer Ex Rel. Zimmer v. Celebrities, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. City of Aurora v. WeeksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API