Legal Opinion

United States v. Mingo

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 26, 1957No. 9199PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused was charged with attempted rape. At the trial, the law officer instructed on assault with intent to commit rape and indecent assault as lesser 'included offenses. On this appeal the accused contends that the law officer erred in these instructions to his prejudice.

In United States v Hobbs, 7 USCMA 693, 23 CMR 157, the majority of the Court held that assault with intent to commit rape is lesser included in a charge of attempted rape. However, whether a lesser offense is present in a particular case depends upon the evidence. Here,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. HobbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. GurevichUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. RegaladoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  2. United States v. DuckworthUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  3. United States v. RodgersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. BarberUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API