Tarvin v. Tarvin

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

Following the Supreme Court’s order of transfer with directions, we again consider the question whether the California court has personal jurisdiction over a nonresident husband for purposes of dividing an omitted community property asset—husband’s military pension. We con- elude under the circumstances shown here that no personal jurisdiction existed. We affirm.

Facts

Husband and wife were married in 1948. During their 22-year marriage husband was an officer in the U.S. Air Force, and the couple lived in many places. In 1971, while temporarily stationed in California,…