Bassett v. U.S. Cast Iron Pipe and Foundry
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The difficulties arising out of the above state of facts are principally those of interpretation. We must ascertain the nature and character of the fund known as "Reserve for additional working capital," and we must understand the relation which the statutory provisions bear to the engagements that the shareholders have entered into among themselves, in the company's charter and by-laws, in order to determine the character of this fund.
Primarily, it is a function of the stockholders to fix the amount to be reserved, over and above the capital stock paid in, as a working capital. Corp. act…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Moran v. U.S. Cast Iron Pipe, C., Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
- Guttmann v. Illinois Central R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Wilson v. American Ice Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1913
- Cintas v. American Car Foundry Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Grand Rapids, G. H. & M. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.