Legal Opinion

State v. Tripp

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1985No. 843SC467PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Agent Casale testified, on direct examination, that in his opinion the substance obtained from the defendant was heroin. He based his opinion on the test results of an infrared test, two color tests and a mass spectrometer analysis. On cross-examination, defendant elicited from Agent Casale that he did not conduct the test performed on the spectrometer, but was testifying to results conducted by Agent Raney. Defendant objected and moved to strike this testimony as inadmissible hearsay, due to the fact Agent Casale had no personal knowledge of the test and was testifying from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. WadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Penland v. BIRD COAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. State v. FranksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. GaryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API