Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Johnson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided October 10, 1928No. 12508PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] October 10, 1928. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The facts giving rise to this action are briefly these. Some time in 1892, C.A. Keel died seized and possessed of a tract of land situate in Aiken County, this State, containing some 400 acres, which tract of land is the land in question herein. By his will, which was duly probated, he gave all of his property, real and personal, to his wife for life or widowhood, and at her death to be equally divided…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kirton v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Cagle v. SchaeferSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
- Ex Parte Union Manufacturing and Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Turpin v. SudduthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
- Brown v. SartorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crystal Ice Co. of Cola. v. First Colonial Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- Davis v. SCBT, N.A. (In re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. PalmerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933