Village of Crosby v. Stemich
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
After conviction in the municipal court of the village of Crosby of the violation of a village ordinance, defendant’s attempted appeal to the district court was dismissed. She appeals from the judgment of dismissal.
The appeal to the district court was attempted under section 7602, G. S. 1913, as amended by chapter 283, p. 420, Laws 1917. It was dismissed upon the ground that it should have been taken under section 7638, G. S. 1913, because the conviction was “of a criminal offense.”
*262The only question, therefore, is as to which of the two statutes should be followed in municipal courts,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. MarciniakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- City of Madison v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Village of Elbow Lake v. HoltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. EndSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. KettererSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- City of St. Paul v. WhidbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- City of St. Paul v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.