In Re Estate of Freud
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a decree of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco making a partial distribution of the estate of a deceased person. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Hart H. North, Henry E. Monroe, and W. B. Treadwell, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an appeal by the grantee of one of the heirs of Morris Freud, deceased, from a decree of partial distribution. Two points are made: That the court erred,— 1. In refusing a continuance; and 2. In distributing the property in the face of an unexecuted order by the court requiring the sale of the property distributed, to pay debts and expenses of administration.
Morris Freud died testate, and his will, after certain provisions, unimportant here, gave his entire estate to his widow for life, in trust, remainder to his five children. Appellant has acquired the interest of Jacob Freud, one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Toland v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- In re the Estate of GarraudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- In re Estate of SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Halleck v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by8 opinions
- Elizalde v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Flanigan v. Security-First Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
- Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Shaw v. State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Geraldine Shaw v. State Of California Department Of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.