Legal Opinion
Flanigan v. Security-First Nat. Bank
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 8, 1941No. 1723PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.
The defendants moved the court to dismiss the complaint on the grounds: (1) That the complaint failed to state a cause of action. (2) Without leave to amend, for the reason that the complaint could not be amended in view of the facts stated, and (3) That the court lacks jurisdiction because no controversy is pending.
This action is a contest over property left by the decedent, Georgia Anna Hebert. Some dates set forth in the complaint are important and will assist in clarifying the problem if set forth in- order. They are as follows:
December 16, 1889. Georgia…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Case of Broderick's WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Byers v. McAuleySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Raymond C. Byers v. Guinevere E. ByersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Colby v. ColbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Laguna Village, Inc. v. Laborers' International Union of North AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Kirk v. SiquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Smith v. Carter Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.